2022 Melbourne Sessions

Session 1: Money Revenue Generation

Session: 1

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: Money Revenue Generation

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: Simon and James (Stantec)

Summary

  • The focus of the discussion is how to increase revenue from transport facilities. Public transport will be assisting movement for people and be free to use.

  • Public transport expenses are significant for operation and maintenance.

  • The primary opportunity lies in congestion pricing, proper pricing for parking, and fare payment encouragement.

  • The City of Melbourne receives a significant proportion from on-street parking, and shared car facilities. Encourage Public transport use has been provided by reducing discounts on particular days of the week, and discounts for a group of people.

  • Maximising asset utilisation.

Session 3: Has Covid Killed Public Transport?

Session: 3

Room: Supper Room

Session Title: Has Covid Killed Public Transport?

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Phillip Mallis (City of Yarra)

Summary

  • Covid has a significant decrease in PTV patronage. This is ongoing post-covid. Surprisingly, bus ridership has performed better. Consider the buses that service hospitals, and places of employment that cannot be completed by working from home.

  • Infrastructure Victoria outlined that CBD employment has decreased. WFH has increased working in suburban areas.

  • Trip purpose: Important to consider, however, the shortfall of the census is that it captures travel to work. The VISTA data set is more robust, and this is taken every 2 years.

  • During COVID, car transport increased for work, recreation, and services.

  • Cycling: The bike counters have shown LOWER bike use in 2022. In the lockdown, cycling ridership managed to remain consistent, which is impressive considering fewer people were commuting to work. With the overall drop in cycling volume from 2018-2022, we are returning to 2010 levels.

  • Challenges: There are blind spots in the data collection. Trip purpose is limited. The data is not consistent, symmetry is essential. The frequency needs to also be increased. The data also needs to be accessible, in a spreadsheet form, why is data presented in a pdf in 2022?

  • Data Gaps: We do not collate PTV crowding, vehicle crowding, tram patronage by line, or PTV journey purposes.

  • Classpass format: We need better options to purchase Myki use. A deal when you receive ten passes and it is cheaper. The people who least afford it cannot. New York has a weekly cap, this would incentivise. Weekly deals could really help shift from car dependency. Instead of annual deals, look for weekly. Off-peak transport is a great deal, but people did not really know about it, it needs to be communicated best.

  • The lack of tolerance for incomplete data has impacted the release of patronage data. Tense conversation! What happens when places do not have the resources to navigate the criticisms? We need a better picture of patronage and there are many behind the scene challenges that affect how data is circulated and presented.

  • Privacy concerns towards Governments collecting qualitative data.

  • How can we capitalise on the post-covid interest in getting back in the community. Should we encourage people to WFH or come into the office? Who gets to make these decisions?

  • The message needs to be spread, if we say nothing driving will continue to increase at default.

  • Congestion charging: Will this work, or will people continue to drive and accept the costs? Generally, individuals are resilient to change, therefore intense advocacy and education are essential.

Session 3: Victoria Transportation Integration Plan

Session: 3

Room: Yarra Room

Session Title: Victoria Transportation Integration Plan

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Catherine McNaughton

Summary

  • Call on the Victorian government to work with councils and communities to develop metro and Victoria regional transport and land use plans.

  • Create the places communities want.

  • Assess infrastructure proposal to demonstrate maximum community and environmental benefits.

  • Prioritize equity and people.

  • Achieve net zero greenhouse gas emission transport and land systems.

  • Include traditional owners’ perspectives, knowledge and country plans.

  • Include full community engagement. As required under the transport integration act 2010 and climate change act 2017.

  • Ad hoc projects have demonstrated limited community benefits, lack of integration, and limited linked benefits.

  • Consider the scales of challenges that arise with population growth; changing commuting and living patterns, technology, climate and biodiversity emergencies.

Session 3: Zero Traffic Growth with Increasing Population

Session: 3

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: Zero Traffic Growth with Increasing Population

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Lisa (DoT)

Summary

  • The community complains about inadequate parking, yet people are aware of the traffic congestion.

  • Consider a defined restriction for parking per household.

  • Policy needs to be specific.

  • Considered the opportunity of car sharing.

  • How can we support younger generations and public transport use?

  • We need to allow for time to see the behavioural change as infrastructure and restrictions will not radically change the car-dependent scenario.

  • Restricting owning a car until a certain age could also be a way to ownership control.

Session 3: Active Transport Integration

Session: 3

Room: Melbourne Room

Session Title: Active transport integration

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Danny Davis

Summary

  • FLAIR: Flexible, local, accessible, integrated, and responsive.

  • Accessibility in stations should be increased.

  • High patronage for better bus stops.

  • App-based information needs to be reliable.

  • Multimodal journey app timetable should be user-friendly.

  • Sharing data between companies will increase journey reliability.

Session 3: Political advocacy for better transport service

Session: 3

Room: Regent Room

Session Title: Political advocacy for better transport service

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Peter Parket (Melbourne on Transit)

Summary

  • Transformed transit for Melbourne Political volatility has both positive and negative impacts.

  • How to decrease the number of vehicles in outer suburbs to introduce public transport systems with high frequency and good connectivity. Is poor frequency why car use remains widespread?

  • Recommended book: The making and unmaking east-west link.

  • Bus services are the key to establishing an integrated transport network.

Session 4: How can we reduce parking with car sharing?

Session: 4

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: How can we reduce parking with car sharing?

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: Darcy (GoGet)

Summary

  • Carshare facilitates placemaking and intermodal transport.

  • Consider Peel Street where curbside parking slots were replaced by bike lanes.

  • Users drive 50% less than before they joined the service. Increase access, and reduce costs/VKT. Car-sharing to tackle last-mile issues.

  • 4 Key Benefits of onsite carshare -> reduce project costs (1 parking space $50k-$100k), improve project delivery timelines, reduce environmental impact and provide amenities to the local community.

  • Requirements for onsite carshare -> a parking bay, mobile signal for the carshare vehicle, 24/7 controlled access. In front of/behind the security barrier. They provide different types of vehicles to meet different demands, such as vans to allow people to move houses.

Session 5: Cultural Landscape

Session: 5

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: Cultural Landscape

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Heather (Geelong City Council)

Summary

  • Aboriginal people have settled in Moorabool and Barwon Rivers, but those lands were not preserved based on their cultural landscape.

  • Evidence of heritage is limited to tangible things, however, consider the intangible method of First Nations Storytelling. First Nations' cultural heritage and identity are often framed through the western planning system and the inclusion as stakeholders.

  • Strong People Strong Country Policy- developed and led by First Nations People. Introduces a re-framing where inclusion is explored through how the identity of the Traditional owners is dependent on the health of the Country and their environment.

  • This is a shift away from policies that looked at inclusion from a stakeholder perspective, that in a way forced First Nations people to engage with the western/colonial planning system. How can policies support First Nations individuals that do not live in their Country, this is particularly common as a consequence of the Stolen Generation.

Session 6: Reducing Carbon Emissions

Session: 6

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: Reducing Carbon Emissions

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: William McDougall

Summary

  • North East Link, emissions saved only account for 3% of total emissions over 30 years of running the road.

  • Coal exports are not being taken into account in our 'net zero' goals.

  • Transport solutions: Currently planning for a sharp decline in emissions rather than linear descent. Where is the electricity coming from for electric transport?

  • There is a lack of implementation ideas and no actual plan for emissions reduction.

  • The AGL early closing of coal plants was an early win.

  • Consider, Carbon pricing, and greater transparency in scope in emissions and materials (how they travel, where they come from). Onsets vs offsets. Incremental timelines rather than just 30 years.

  • We need to encourage people and behaviour change and actively work towards emissions reduction. E.g. taxes and disincentives for driving SUVs in Norway or France.

  • Educate about where super is investing in. Tangible and teaching people how they are affecting emissions. Small personal education campaigns. Who do you bank with etc.

  • Private enterprise is likely to drive innovation more than government.

  • Repurposing of EV batteries once reached the end of their ability to power vehicles.

  • Priority should be making public transport the first choice.

  • No money in behavioural change and a decrease in consumption is needed, that is where government needs to step in.