2022 Melbourne Sessions

Session 3: Has Covid Killed Public Transport?

Session: 3

Room: Supper Room

Session Title: Has Covid Killed Public Transport?

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Phillip Mallis (City of Yarra)

Summary

  • Covid has a significant decrease in PTV patronage. This is ongoing post-covid. Surprisingly, bus ridership has performed better. Consider the buses that service hospitals, and places of employment that cannot be completed by working from home.

  • Infrastructure Victoria outlined that CBD employment has decreased. WFH has increased working in suburban areas.

  • Trip purpose: Important to consider, however, the shortfall of the census is that it captures travel to work. The VISTA data set is more robust, and this is taken every 2 years.

  • During COVID, car transport increased for work, recreation, and services.

  • Cycling: The bike counters have shown LOWER bike use in 2022. In the lockdown, cycling ridership managed to remain consistent, which is impressive considering fewer people were commuting to work. With the overall drop in cycling volume from 2018-2022, we are returning to 2010 levels.

  • Challenges: There are blind spots in the data collection. Trip purpose is limited. The data is not consistent, symmetry is essential. The frequency needs to also be increased. The data also needs to be accessible, in a spreadsheet form, why is data presented in a pdf in 2022?

  • Data Gaps: We do not collate PTV crowding, vehicle crowding, tram patronage by line, or PTV journey purposes.

  • Classpass format: We need better options to purchase Myki use. A deal when you receive ten passes and it is cheaper. The people who least afford it cannot. New York has a weekly cap, this would incentivise. Weekly deals could really help shift from car dependency. Instead of annual deals, look for weekly. Off-peak transport is a great deal, but people did not really know about it, it needs to be communicated best.

  • The lack of tolerance for incomplete data has impacted the release of patronage data. Tense conversation! What happens when places do not have the resources to navigate the criticisms? We need a better picture of patronage and there are many behind the scene challenges that affect how data is circulated and presented.

  • Privacy concerns towards Governments collecting qualitative data.

  • How can we capitalise on the post-covid interest in getting back in the community. Should we encourage people to WFH or come into the office? Who gets to make these decisions?

  • The message needs to be spread, if we say nothing driving will continue to increase at default.

  • Congestion charging: Will this work, or will people continue to drive and accept the costs? Generally, individuals are resilient to change, therefore intense advocacy and education are essential.

Session 3: Victoria Transportation Integration Plan

Session: 3

Room: Yarra Room

Session Title: Victoria Transportation Integration Plan

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Catherine McNaughton

Summary

  • Call on the Victorian government to work with councils and communities to develop metro and Victoria regional transport and land use plans.

  • Create the places communities want.

  • Assess infrastructure proposal to demonstrate maximum community and environmental benefits.

  • Prioritize equity and people.

  • Achieve net zero greenhouse gas emission transport and land systems.

  • Include traditional owners’ perspectives, knowledge and country plans.

  • Include full community engagement. As required under the transport integration act 2010 and climate change act 2017.

  • Ad hoc projects have demonstrated limited community benefits, lack of integration, and limited linked benefits.

  • Consider the scales of challenges that arise with population growth; changing commuting and living patterns, technology, climate and biodiversity emergencies.

Session 3: Zero Traffic Growth with Increasing Population

Session: 3

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: Zero Traffic Growth with Increasing Population

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Lisa (DoT)

Summary

  • The community complains about inadequate parking, yet people are aware of the traffic congestion.

  • Consider a defined restriction for parking per household.

  • Policy needs to be specific.

  • Considered the opportunity of car sharing.

  • How can we support younger generations and public transport use?

  • We need to allow for time to see the behavioural change as infrastructure and restrictions will not radically change the car-dependent scenario.

  • Restricting owning a car until a certain age could also be a way to ownership control.

Session 3: Active Transport Integration

Session: 3

Room: Melbourne Room

Session Title: Active transport integration

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Danny Davis

Summary

  • FLAIR: Flexible, local, accessible, integrated, and responsive.

  • Accessibility in stations should be increased.

  • High patronage for better bus stops.

  • App-based information needs to be reliable.

  • Multimodal journey app timetable should be user-friendly.

  • Sharing data between companies will increase journey reliability.

Session 3: Political advocacy for better transport service

Session: 3

Room: Regent Room

Session Title: Political advocacy for better transport service

Format: Presentation

Presenter Name: Peter Parket (Melbourne on Transit)

Summary

  • Transformed transit for Melbourne Political volatility has both positive and negative impacts.

  • How to decrease the number of vehicles in outer suburbs to introduce public transport systems with high frequency and good connectivity. Is poor frequency why car use remains widespread?

  • Recommended book: The making and unmaking east-west link.

  • Bus services are the key to establishing an integrated transport network.

Session 4: The Inside 'Scooter' - Melbourne E-scooter Trial

Session: 4

Room: Supper Room

Session Title: The Inside 'Scooter' - Melbourne E-scooter Trial

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: Samaj and Ronard (Neuron)

Summary

  • Data Overview: Feb to June 2022 Average transport distance 2.16km. Average trip durations 15.5 mins, Average trip per day 7408 trips. Total trips 1194300 trips. Total distance 2580066 km.

  • Contribute to supporting Melbourne's major events; 41% of users said that the environmentally friendly nature of e-scooters was a factor.

  • The shared bike lane network has also a low rate of accidents.

  • 65% of scooter users indicated they made a purchase at the start or end of their trip.

  • Daily public complaints decreased quickly after the launch.

  • Concerns: Parking, footpath use, user noncompliance, reporting systems.

  • Will private e-scooter users become public e-scooter users if the regulations are tightended?

Session 4: Public Transport Data Collection

Session: 4

Room: Yarra Room

Session Title: How can we reduce parking with car sharing?

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: Josh (Infrastructure Victoria)

Summary

  • Good data will be received if the service is simple.

  • Ticketing data is very difficult to use as fewer touch on and off in Victoria.

  • Train myki data is much better for touch on and off in Victoria compared to the other states.

  • Queensland trip data is complete and open to the agencies.

  • VISTA data is scarce and time-dependent.

Session 4: How can we reduce parking with car sharing?

Session: 4

Room: Portico Room

Session Title: How can we reduce parking with car sharing?

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: Darcy (GoGet)

Summary

  • Carshare facilitates placemaking and intermodal transport.

  • Consider Peel Street where curbside parking slots were replaced by bike lanes.

  • Users drive 50% less than before they joined the service. Increase access, and reduce costs/VKT. Car-sharing to tackle last-mile issues.

  • 4 Key Benefits of onsite carshare -> reduce project costs (1 parking space $50k-$100k), improve project delivery timelines, reduce environmental impact and provide amenities to the local community.

  • Requirements for onsite carshare -> a parking bay, mobile signal for the carshare vehicle, 24/7 controlled access. In front of/behind the security barrier. They provide different types of vehicles to meet different demands, such as vans to allow people to move houses.

Session 4: Free Public Transport

Session: 4

Room: Regent Room

Session Title: Free Public Transport

Format: Discussion

Presenter Name: Rosie (City of Stonnington)

Summary

  • Only 30% of operating costs are funded currently, funding has to come from somewhere.

  • Free Tram Zone takes pedestrians off the street and requires more services, increasing costs due to increased demand, mode shift away from walking, loss in revenue and spike in demand.

  • The issue is not limited to cost, but access particularly for those with poor access (outer suburbs). Not many big systems that are free, there are smaller ones. Instead put tram revenue in areas which need it for example Melton, and Clyde.

  • Look at the full network and where a free zone would increase the uptake of public transport (not away from pedestrians).

  • Costs too much to travel to/from regional Vic (over $20) on VLine. Lower price of regional passengers.

  • Transport has to become a service: Means-tested pricing, flexible/dynamic fares based on demand.

  • Transport projects are measured by travel time savings, which is very narrow.

  • Who is going to integrate these services?

  • Consider safety when considering mode choice and MaaS, which fills a gap when people do not feel safe walking.